Approach and Comments

So thanks to everyone for the support in the first week. It’s stunning to see how many views and likes some of the posts have received. A few people have been nice enough to reach out and offer thanks which is very humbling.

I want to highlight a few caveats I need to make clear.

• The posts are not very academically rigorous. I have written papers in the past and its a really great way to stop any urge to write at all.

• Partly they exist for me to improve my own practise, you will learn more by trying to teach the essence of a topic than reading it yourself, in my own experience.

• They are not intended to be the last word (or even a middle word) on a topic, but I feel I have a pragmatic approach that is logic based and quality risk minded.

• They reflect how I approach a problem. There are several ways to tackle any problem. They key is you find one that is functional for you.

• If anyone really has an issue with the content they are free to highlight it. I present my words in good faith.

I want to make clear that I don’t really have a grand goal in mind. Daily I even question why put this content out. It’s just a will to try and make something more enduring than the next QMS record. I am not currently planning to do any discussion sessions with trainees or groups - I am trying to divert my limited non-work time into fleshing out the content on the site.

If anyone really has an issue with the content they are free to highlight it. I present my words in good faith.

I have learned how to turn comments on - but only for the blog posts yet.